From 61a4d3d45c91cb19a114796846e5af014f59a6b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Hensing Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:08:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] getSnippetUpTo: Return optional This makes it possible to certain discern failures from empty snippets, which I think is an ok review comment. Maybe it should do so for swapped column indexes too, but I'm not sure. I don't think it matters in the grand scheme. We don't even have a real use case for `nullopt` now anyway. Since we don't have a use case, I'm not applying this logic to higher level functions yet. --- src/libexpr/nixexpr.cc | 2 +- src/libutil/position.cc | 6 +++--- src/libutil/position.hh | 2 +- tests/unit/libutil/position.cc | 8 +++++--- 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/libexpr/nixexpr.cc b/src/libexpr/nixexpr.cc index d54f0b684..93c8bdef6 100644 --- a/src/libexpr/nixexpr.cc +++ b/src/libexpr/nixexpr.cc @@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ size_t SymbolTable::totalSize() const std::string DocComment::getInnerText(const PosTable & positions) const { auto beginPos = positions[begin]; auto endPos = positions[end]; - auto docCommentStr = beginPos.getSnippetUpTo(endPos); + auto docCommentStr = beginPos.getSnippetUpTo(endPos).value_or(""); // Strip "/**" and "*/" constexpr size_t prefixLen = 3; diff --git a/src/libutil/position.cc b/src/libutil/position.cc index 508816d85..3289dbe8b 100644 --- a/src/libutil/position.cc +++ b/src/libutil/position.cc @@ -110,11 +110,11 @@ void Pos::LinesIterator::bump(bool atFirst) input.remove_prefix(eol); } -std::string Pos::getSnippetUpTo(const Pos & end) const { +std::optional Pos::getSnippetUpTo(const Pos & end) const { assert(this->origin == end.origin); if (end.line < this->line) - return ""; + return std::nullopt; if (auto source = getSource()) { @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ std::string Pos::getSnippetUpTo(const Pos & end) const { } return result; } - return ""; + return std::nullopt; } diff --git a/src/libutil/position.hh b/src/libutil/position.hh index aba263fdf..25217069c 100644 --- a/src/libutil/position.hh +++ b/src/libutil/position.hh @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ struct Pos bool operator==(const Pos & rhs) const = default; auto operator<=>(const Pos & rhs) const = default; - std::string getSnippetUpTo(const Pos & end) const; + std::optional getSnippetUpTo(const Pos & end) const; /** * Get the SourcePath, if the source was loaded from a file. diff --git a/tests/unit/libutil/position.cc b/tests/unit/libutil/position.cc index d38d2c538..484ecc247 100644 --- a/tests/unit/libutil/position.cc +++ b/tests/unit/libutil/position.cc @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ TEST(Position, getSnippetUpTo_1) ASSERT_EQ(start.getSnippetUpTo(start), ""); ASSERT_EQ(start.getSnippetUpTo(end), "x"); ASSERT_EQ(end.getSnippetUpTo(end), ""); - ASSERT_EQ(end.getSnippetUpTo(start), ""); + ASSERT_EQ(end.getSnippetUpTo(start), std::nullopt); } { // NOTE: line and column are actually 1-based indexes @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ TEST(Position, getSnippetUpTo_1) ASSERT_EQ(start.getSnippetUpTo(end), ""); ASSERT_EQ(end.getSnippetUpTo(end), ""); - ASSERT_EQ(end.getSnippetUpTo(start), ""); + ASSERT_EQ(end.getSnippetUpTo(start), std::nullopt); } { Pos start(1, 1, o); @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ TEST(Position, getSnippetUpTo_1) ASSERT_EQ(start.getSnippetUpTo(start), ""); ASSERT_EQ(start.getSnippetUpTo(end), "x"); ASSERT_EQ(end.getSnippetUpTo(end), ""); - ASSERT_EQ(end.getSnippetUpTo(start), ""); + ASSERT_EQ(end.getSnippetUpTo(start), std::nullopt); } } TEST(Position, getSnippetUpTo_2) @@ -65,6 +65,8 @@ TEST(Position, getSnippetUpTo_2) ASSERT_EQ(start.getSnippetUpTo(start), ""); ASSERT_EQ(start.getSnippetUpTo(end), "a"); ASSERT_EQ(end.getSnippetUpTo(end), ""); + + // nullopt? I feel like changing the column handling would just make it more fragile ASSERT_EQ(end.getSnippetUpTo(start), ""); } {