2022-08-18 06:47:26 -04:00
|
|
|
use crate::exercise::{Exercise, ExerciseList};
|
2022-06-15 23:53:41 -04:00
|
|
|
use crate::project::RustAnalyzerProject;
|
2022-08-18 06:47:26 -04:00
|
|
|
use crate::run::{reset, run};
|
2019-01-09 14:33:58 -05:00
|
|
|
use crate::verify::verify;
|
2023-08-25 17:18:01 -04:00
|
|
|
use clap::{Parser, Subcommand};
|
2019-12-22 15:27:38 -05:00
|
|
|
use console::Emoji;
|
2023-11-15 17:17:40 -05:00
|
|
|
use notify_debouncer_mini::notify::{self, RecursiveMode};
|
|
|
|
use notify_debouncer_mini::{new_debouncer, DebouncedEventKind};
|
2019-03-06 13:38:55 -05:00
|
|
|
use std::ffi::OsStr;
|
2019-04-11 16:41:24 -04:00
|
|
|
use std::fs;
|
2020-12-12 13:48:25 -05:00
|
|
|
use std::io::{self, prelude::*};
|
2019-03-16 22:15:09 -04:00
|
|
|
use std::path::Path;
|
2019-11-11 11:15:14 -05:00
|
|
|
use std::process::{Command, Stdio};
|
2021-09-14 06:34:40 -04:00
|
|
|
use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicBool, Ordering};
|
2021-09-25 05:23:05 -04:00
|
|
|
use std::sync::mpsc::{channel, RecvTimeoutError};
|
2019-11-18 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
use std::sync::{Arc, Mutex};
|
|
|
|
use std::thread;
|
2018-11-26 06:41:39 -05:00
|
|
|
use std::time::Duration;
|
2019-01-09 14:33:43 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-20 14:11:53 -05:00
|
|
|
#[macro_use]
|
|
|
|
mod ui;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-11 16:41:24 -04:00
|
|
|
mod exercise;
|
2022-06-15 23:53:41 -04:00
|
|
|
mod project;
|
2019-01-09 14:33:43 -05:00
|
|
|
mod run;
|
2019-01-09 14:33:58 -05:00
|
|
|
mod verify;
|
2018-05-14 12:41:58 -04:00
|
|
|
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
/// Rustlings is a collection of small exercises to get you used to writing and reading Rust code
|
2023-08-25 17:18:01 -04:00
|
|
|
#[derive(Parser)]
|
|
|
|
#[command(version)]
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
struct Args {
|
2023-08-25 17:18:01 -04:00
|
|
|
/// Show outputs from the test exercises
|
|
|
|
#[arg(long)]
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
nocapture: bool,
|
2023-08-25 17:18:01 -04:00
|
|
|
#[command(subcommand)]
|
|
|
|
command: Option<Subcommands>,
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-08-25 17:18:01 -04:00
|
|
|
#[derive(Subcommand)]
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
enum Subcommands {
|
2023-08-25 17:18:01 -04:00
|
|
|
/// Verify all exercises according to the recommended order
|
|
|
|
Verify,
|
|
|
|
/// Rerun `verify` when files were edited
|
|
|
|
Watch {
|
|
|
|
/// Show hints on success
|
|
|
|
#[arg(long)]
|
|
|
|
success_hints: bool,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
/// Run/Test a single exercise
|
|
|
|
Run {
|
|
|
|
/// The name of the exercise
|
|
|
|
name: String,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
/// Reset a single exercise using "git stash -- <filename>"
|
|
|
|
Reset {
|
|
|
|
/// The name of the exercise
|
|
|
|
name: String,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
/// Return a hint for the given exercise
|
|
|
|
Hint {
|
|
|
|
/// The name of the exercise
|
|
|
|
name: String,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
/// List the exercises available in Rustlings
|
|
|
|
List {
|
|
|
|
/// Show only the paths of the exercises
|
|
|
|
#[arg(short, long)]
|
|
|
|
paths: bool,
|
|
|
|
/// Show only the names of the exercises
|
|
|
|
#[arg(short, long)]
|
|
|
|
names: bool,
|
|
|
|
/// Provide a string to match exercise names.
|
|
|
|
/// Comma separated patterns are accepted
|
|
|
|
#[arg(short, long)]
|
|
|
|
filter: Option<String>,
|
|
|
|
/// Display only exercises not yet solved
|
|
|
|
#[arg(short, long)]
|
|
|
|
unsolved: bool,
|
|
|
|
/// Display only exercises that have been solved
|
|
|
|
#[arg(short, long)]
|
|
|
|
solved: bool,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
/// Enable rust-analyzer for exercises
|
|
|
|
Lsp,
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-09 14:31:14 -05:00
|
|
|
fn main() {
|
2023-08-25 17:18:01 -04:00
|
|
|
let args = Args::parse();
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2023-08-25 17:18:01 -04:00
|
|
|
if args.command.is_none() {
|
2022-10-12 16:30:52 -04:00
|
|
|
println!("\n{WELCOME}\n");
|
2019-01-09 14:44:55 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-11-14 14:12:20 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2019-03-16 22:15:09 -04:00
|
|
|
if !Path::new("info.toml").exists() {
|
|
|
|
println!(
|
|
|
|
"{} must be run from the rustlings directory",
|
|
|
|
std::env::current_exe().unwrap().to_str().unwrap()
|
|
|
|
);
|
2019-04-22 06:43:39 -04:00
|
|
|
println!("Try `cd rustlings/`!");
|
2019-03-16 22:15:09 -04:00
|
|
|
std::process::exit(1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-11-11 11:15:14 -05:00
|
|
|
if !rustc_exists() {
|
|
|
|
println!("We cannot find `rustc`.");
|
|
|
|
println!("Try running `rustc --version` to diagnose your problem.");
|
|
|
|
println!("For instructions on how to install Rust, check the README.");
|
|
|
|
std::process::exit(1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-11 16:41:24 -04:00
|
|
|
let toml_str = &fs::read_to_string("info.toml").unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let exercises = toml::from_str::<ExerciseList>(toml_str).unwrap().exercises;
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
let verbose = args.nocapture;
|
2019-04-11 16:41:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2023-08-25 17:18:01 -04:00
|
|
|
let command = args.command.unwrap_or_else(|| {
|
2022-10-12 16:30:52 -04:00
|
|
|
println!("{DEFAULT_OUT}\n");
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
std::process::exit(0);
|
|
|
|
});
|
2023-08-25 17:18:01 -04:00
|
|
|
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
match command {
|
2023-08-25 17:18:01 -04:00
|
|
|
Subcommands::List {
|
|
|
|
paths,
|
|
|
|
names,
|
|
|
|
filter,
|
|
|
|
unsolved,
|
|
|
|
solved,
|
|
|
|
} => {
|
|
|
|
if !paths && !names {
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
println!("{:<17}\t{:<46}\t{:<7}", "Name", "Path", "Status");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let mut exercises_done: u16 = 0;
|
2024-03-23 16:56:40 -04:00
|
|
|
let lowercase_filter = filter
|
|
|
|
.as_ref()
|
|
|
|
.map(|s| s.to_lowercase())
|
|
|
|
.unwrap_or_default();
|
|
|
|
let filters = lowercase_filter
|
|
|
|
.split(',')
|
|
|
|
.filter_map(|f| {
|
|
|
|
let f = f.trim();
|
|
|
|
if f.is_empty() {
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
Some(f)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for exercise in &exercises {
|
2024-03-24 13:47:27 -04:00
|
|
|
let fname = exercise.path.to_string_lossy();
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
let filter_cond = filters
|
2024-03-23 16:56:40 -04:00
|
|
|
.iter()
|
|
|
|
.any(|f| exercise.name.contains(f) || fname.contains(f));
|
|
|
|
let status = if exercise.looks_done() {
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
exercises_done += 1;
|
|
|
|
"Done"
|
2020-12-12 13:48:25 -05:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
"Pending"
|
2020-12-12 13:48:25 -05:00
|
|
|
};
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
let solve_cond = {
|
2024-03-23 16:56:40 -04:00
|
|
|
(exercise.looks_done() && solved)
|
|
|
|
|| (!exercise.looks_done() && unsolved)
|
2023-08-25 17:18:01 -04:00
|
|
|
|| (!solved && !unsolved)
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
};
|
2023-08-25 17:18:01 -04:00
|
|
|
if solve_cond && (filter_cond || filter.is_none()) {
|
|
|
|
let line = if paths {
|
2022-10-12 16:30:52 -04:00
|
|
|
format!("{fname}\n")
|
2023-08-25 17:18:01 -04:00
|
|
|
} else if names {
|
2024-03-23 16:56:40 -04:00
|
|
|
format!("{}\n", exercise.name)
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2024-03-23 16:56:40 -04:00
|
|
|
format!("{:<17}\t{fname:<46}\t{status:<7}\n", exercise.name)
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// Somehow using println! leads to the binary panicking
|
|
|
|
// when its output is piped.
|
|
|
|
// So, we're handling a Broken Pipe error and exiting with 0 anyway
|
|
|
|
let stdout = std::io::stdout();
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let mut handle = stdout.lock();
|
|
|
|
handle.write_all(line.as_bytes()).unwrap_or_else(|e| {
|
|
|
|
match e.kind() {
|
|
|
|
std::io::ErrorKind::BrokenPipe => std::process::exit(0),
|
|
|
|
_ => std::process::exit(1),
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-12-12 13:48:25 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
2024-03-23 16:56:40 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
let percentage_progress = exercises_done as f32 / exercises.len() as f32 * 100.0;
|
|
|
|
println!(
|
2022-10-03 08:56:46 -04:00
|
|
|
"Progress: You completed {} / {} exercises ({:.1} %).",
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
exercises_done,
|
|
|
|
exercises.len(),
|
|
|
|
percentage_progress
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
std::process::exit(0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-04-11 16:41:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2023-08-25 17:18:01 -04:00
|
|
|
Subcommands::Run { name } => {
|
|
|
|
let exercise = find_exercise(&name, &exercises);
|
2018-11-23 09:18:43 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2021-08-24 08:06:30 -04:00
|
|
|
run(exercise, verbose).unwrap_or_else(|_| std::process::exit(1));
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-11-11 10:51:38 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2023-08-25 17:18:01 -04:00
|
|
|
Subcommands::Reset { name } => {
|
|
|
|
let exercise = find_exercise(&name, &exercises);
|
2022-08-17 10:31:53 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reset(exercise).unwrap_or_else(|_| std::process::exit(1));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-08-25 17:18:01 -04:00
|
|
|
Subcommands::Hint { name } => {
|
|
|
|
let exercise = find_exercise(&name, &exercises);
|
2019-11-11 10:51:38 -05:00
|
|
|
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
println!("{}", exercise.hint);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-11-11 10:51:38 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2023-08-25 17:18:01 -04:00
|
|
|
Subcommands::Verify => {
|
2023-05-02 16:46:41 -04:00
|
|
|
verify(&exercises, (0, exercises.len()), verbose, false)
|
2022-08-17 10:31:53 -04:00
|
|
|
.unwrap_or_else(|_| std::process::exit(1));
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-11-26 06:41:39 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2023-08-25 17:18:01 -04:00
|
|
|
Subcommands::Lsp => {
|
2022-06-15 23:53:41 -04:00
|
|
|
let mut project = RustAnalyzerProject::new();
|
|
|
|
project
|
|
|
|
.get_sysroot_src()
|
|
|
|
.expect("Couldn't find toolchain path, do you have `rustc` installed?");
|
|
|
|
project
|
2023-01-03 08:14:07 -05:00
|
|
|
.exercises_to_json()
|
2022-06-15 23:53:41 -04:00
|
|
|
.expect("Couldn't parse rustlings exercises files");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if project.crates.is_empty() {
|
|
|
|
println!("Failed find any exercises, make sure you're in the `rustlings` folder");
|
|
|
|
} else if project.write_to_disk().is_err() {
|
|
|
|
println!("Failed to write rust-project.json to disk for rust-analyzer");
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
println!("Successfully generated rust-project.json");
|
|
|
|
println!("rust-analyzer will now parse exercises, restart your language server or editor")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-08-25 17:18:01 -04:00
|
|
|
Subcommands::Watch { success_hints } => match watch(&exercises, verbose, success_hints) {
|
2021-09-25 05:23:05 -04:00
|
|
|
Err(e) => {
|
2022-08-17 10:31:53 -04:00
|
|
|
println!(
|
|
|
|
"Error: Could not watch your progress. Error message was {:?}.",
|
|
|
|
e
|
|
|
|
);
|
2021-09-25 05:23:05 -04:00
|
|
|
println!("Most likely you've run out of disk space or your 'inotify limit' has been reached.");
|
|
|
|
std::process::exit(1);
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-09-25 05:23:05 -04:00
|
|
|
Ok(WatchStatus::Finished) => {
|
2022-08-17 10:31:53 -04:00
|
|
|
println!(
|
|
|
|
"{emoji} All exercises completed! {emoji}",
|
|
|
|
emoji = Emoji("🎉", "★")
|
|
|
|
);
|
2022-10-12 16:30:52 -04:00
|
|
|
println!("\n{FENISH_LINE}\n");
|
2021-09-25 05:23:05 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Ok(WatchStatus::Unfinished) => {
|
|
|
|
println!("We hope you're enjoying learning about Rust!");
|
|
|
|
println!("If you want to continue working on the exercises at a later point, you can simply run `rustlings watch` again");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
},
|
2018-11-26 05:10:38 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-05-06 12:59:50 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-17 10:31:53 -04:00
|
|
|
fn spawn_watch_shell(
|
|
|
|
failed_exercise_hint: &Arc<Mutex<Option<String>>>,
|
|
|
|
should_quit: Arc<AtomicBool>,
|
|
|
|
) {
|
2019-11-18 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
let failed_exercise_hint = Arc::clone(failed_exercise_hint);
|
2021-09-21 04:36:11 -04:00
|
|
|
println!("Welcome to watch mode! You can type 'help' to get an overview of the commands you can use here.");
|
2019-11-18 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
thread::spawn(move || loop {
|
|
|
|
let mut input = String::new();
|
|
|
|
match io::stdin().read_line(&mut input) {
|
|
|
|
Ok(_) => {
|
2020-07-23 14:23:27 -04:00
|
|
|
let input = input.trim();
|
2021-09-14 06:34:40 -04:00
|
|
|
if input == "hint" {
|
2019-11-18 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
if let Some(hint) = &*failed_exercise_hint.lock().unwrap() {
|
2022-10-12 16:30:52 -04:00
|
|
|
println!("{hint}");
|
2019-11-18 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-09-14 06:34:40 -04:00
|
|
|
} else if input == "clear" {
|
2020-07-23 14:23:27 -04:00
|
|
|
println!("\x1B[2J\x1B[1;1H");
|
2021-09-21 04:36:11 -04:00
|
|
|
} else if input.eq("quit") {
|
2021-09-14 06:34:40 -04:00
|
|
|
should_quit.store(true, Ordering::SeqCst);
|
2021-09-21 04:36:11 -04:00
|
|
|
println!("Bye!");
|
|
|
|
} else if input.eq("help") {
|
|
|
|
println!("Commands available to you in watch mode:");
|
2023-04-16 21:44:08 -04:00
|
|
|
println!(" hint - prints the current exercise's hint");
|
|
|
|
println!(" clear - clears the screen");
|
|
|
|
println!(" quit - quits watch mode");
|
|
|
|
println!(" !<cmd> - executes a command, like `!rustc --explain E0381`");
|
|
|
|
println!(" help - displays this help message");
|
2021-09-24 07:04:30 -04:00
|
|
|
println!();
|
2021-09-21 04:36:11 -04:00
|
|
|
println!("Watch mode automatically re-evaluates the current exercise");
|
|
|
|
println!("when you edit a file's contents.")
|
2023-04-16 21:44:08 -04:00
|
|
|
} else if let Some(cmd) = input.strip_prefix('!') {
|
|
|
|
let parts: Vec<&str> = cmd.split_whitespace().collect();
|
|
|
|
if parts.is_empty() {
|
|
|
|
println!("no command provided");
|
|
|
|
} else if let Err(e) = Command::new(parts[0]).args(&parts[1..]).status() {
|
|
|
|
println!("failed to execute command `{}`: {}", cmd, e);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-11-18 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2022-10-12 16:30:52 -04:00
|
|
|
println!("unknown command: {input}");
|
2019-11-18 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-10-12 16:30:52 -04:00
|
|
|
Err(error) => println!("error reading command: {error}"),
|
2019-11-18 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-21 10:21:56 -04:00
|
|
|
fn find_exercise<'a>(name: &str, exercises: &'a [Exercise]) -> &'a Exercise {
|
2021-06-30 06:05:49 -04:00
|
|
|
if name.eq("next") {
|
2022-08-17 10:31:53 -04:00
|
|
|
exercises
|
|
|
|
.iter()
|
|
|
|
.find(|e| !e.looks_done())
|
|
|
|
.unwrap_or_else(|| {
|
|
|
|
println!("🎉 Congratulations! You have done all the exercises!");
|
|
|
|
println!("🔚 There are no more exercises to do next!");
|
|
|
|
std::process::exit(1)
|
|
|
|
})
|
2021-06-30 06:05:49 -04:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2022-08-17 10:31:53 -04:00
|
|
|
exercises
|
|
|
|
.iter()
|
|
|
|
.find(|e| e.name == name)
|
|
|
|
.unwrap_or_else(|| {
|
2022-10-12 16:30:52 -04:00
|
|
|
println!("No exercise found for '{name}'!");
|
2022-08-17 10:31:53 -04:00
|
|
|
std::process::exit(1)
|
|
|
|
})
|
2021-06-30 06:05:49 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
feat: Replace clap with argh
I’ve been wanting to do this for a while, but always procrastinated on it. We’ve been using Clap since the 2.0 rewrite, but Clap is known to be a fairly heavy library. Since Rustlings is usually peoples’ first contact with a Rust compilation, I think it’s in our best interests that this complation is as fast as possible. In effect, replacing Clap with the smaller, structopt-style `argh` reduces the amount of crates needing to be compiled from 82 to 60.
I also think this makes the code way easier to read, we don’t need to use Clap’s methods anymore, but can switch over to using pure Rust methods, e.g., switches are booleans, options are Option<String>s or the like, and subcommands are just structs.
2021-04-20 06:46:49 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-09-14 06:34:40 -04:00
|
|
|
enum WatchStatus {
|
|
|
|
Finished,
|
|
|
|
Unfinished,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-05-17 10:30:22 -04:00
|
|
|
fn watch(
|
|
|
|
exercises: &[Exercise],
|
|
|
|
verbose: bool,
|
|
|
|
success_hints: bool,
|
|
|
|
) -> notify::Result<WatchStatus> {
|
2019-11-09 09:24:24 -05:00
|
|
|
/* Clears the terminal with an ANSI escape code.
|
|
|
|
Works in UNIX and newer Windows terminals. */
|
|
|
|
fn clear_screen() {
|
|
|
|
println!("\x1Bc");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-26 06:41:39 -05:00
|
|
|
let (tx, rx) = channel();
|
2021-09-14 06:34:40 -04:00
|
|
|
let should_quit = Arc::new(AtomicBool::new(false));
|
2018-11-26 06:41:39 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2023-11-15 17:17:40 -05:00
|
|
|
let mut debouncer = new_debouncer(Duration::from_secs(1), tx)?;
|
|
|
|
debouncer
|
|
|
|
.watcher()
|
|
|
|
.watch(Path::new("./exercises"), RecursiveMode::Recursive)?;
|
2018-11-26 06:41:39 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2019-11-09 09:24:24 -05:00
|
|
|
clear_screen();
|
2018-11-26 06:41:39 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2019-11-18 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
let to_owned_hint = |t: &Exercise| t.hint.to_owned();
|
2023-05-17 10:30:22 -04:00
|
|
|
let failed_exercise_hint = match verify(
|
|
|
|
exercises.iter(),
|
|
|
|
(0, exercises.len()),
|
|
|
|
verbose,
|
|
|
|
success_hints,
|
|
|
|
) {
|
2021-09-14 06:34:40 -04:00
|
|
|
Ok(_) => return Ok(WatchStatus::Finished),
|
2019-12-22 15:27:38 -05:00
|
|
|
Err(exercise) => Arc::new(Mutex::new(Some(to_owned_hint(exercise)))),
|
|
|
|
};
|
2021-09-14 06:34:40 -04:00
|
|
|
spawn_watch_shell(&failed_exercise_hint, Arc::clone(&should_quit));
|
2018-11-26 06:41:39 -05:00
|
|
|
loop {
|
2021-09-14 06:34:40 -04:00
|
|
|
match rx.recv_timeout(Duration::from_secs(1)) {
|
2019-01-09 14:33:58 -05:00
|
|
|
Ok(event) => match event {
|
2023-11-15 17:17:40 -05:00
|
|
|
Ok(events) => {
|
|
|
|
for event in events {
|
|
|
|
let event_path = event.path;
|
|
|
|
if event.kind == DebouncedEventKind::Any
|
|
|
|
&& event_path.extension() == Some(OsStr::new("rs"))
|
|
|
|
&& event_path.exists()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let filepath = event_path.as_path().canonicalize().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let pending_exercises =
|
2022-08-17 10:31:53 -04:00
|
|
|
exercises
|
|
|
|
.iter()
|
2023-11-15 17:17:40 -05:00
|
|
|
.find(|e| filepath.ends_with(&e.path))
|
|
|
|
.into_iter()
|
|
|
|
.chain(exercises.iter().filter(|e| {
|
|
|
|
!e.looks_done() && !filepath.ends_with(&e.path)
|
|
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
let num_done = exercises
|
|
|
|
.iter()
|
|
|
|
.filter(|e| e.looks_done() && !filepath.ends_with(&e.path))
|
|
|
|
.count();
|
|
|
|
clear_screen();
|
|
|
|
match verify(
|
|
|
|
pending_exercises,
|
|
|
|
(num_done, exercises.len()),
|
|
|
|
verbose,
|
|
|
|
success_hints,
|
|
|
|
) {
|
|
|
|
Ok(_) => return Ok(WatchStatus::Finished),
|
|
|
|
Err(exercise) => {
|
|
|
|
let mut failed_exercise_hint =
|
|
|
|
failed_exercise_hint.lock().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
*failed_exercise_hint = Some(to_owned_hint(exercise));
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-12-22 15:27:38 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-03-06 13:38:55 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-11-26 06:41:39 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-11-15 17:17:40 -05:00
|
|
|
Err(e) => println!("watch error: {e:?}"),
|
2018-11-26 06:41:39 -05:00
|
|
|
},
|
2021-09-14 06:34:40 -04:00
|
|
|
Err(RecvTimeoutError::Timeout) => {
|
|
|
|
// the timeout expired, just check the `should_quit` variable below then loop again
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-10-12 16:30:52 -04:00
|
|
|
Err(e) => println!("watch error: {e:?}"),
|
2018-11-26 06:41:39 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-09-14 06:34:40 -04:00
|
|
|
// Check if we need to exit
|
|
|
|
if should_quit.load(Ordering::SeqCst) {
|
|
|
|
return Ok(WatchStatus::Unfinished);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-11-26 06:41:39 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-11-11 11:15:14 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn rustc_exists() -> bool {
|
|
|
|
Command::new("rustc")
|
2023-08-26 17:07:20 -04:00
|
|
|
.args(["--version"])
|
2019-11-11 11:15:14 -05:00
|
|
|
.stdout(Stdio::null())
|
2023-09-27 15:33:49 -04:00
|
|
|
.stderr(Stdio::null())
|
|
|
|
.stdin(Stdio::null())
|
2019-11-11 11:15:14 -05:00
|
|
|
.spawn()
|
|
|
|
.and_then(|mut child| child.wait())
|
|
|
|
.map(|status| status.success())
|
|
|
|
.unwrap_or(false)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-04-27 17:09:44 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const DEFAULT_OUT: &str = r#"Thanks for installing Rustlings!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is this your first time? Don't worry, Rustlings was made for beginners! We are
|
|
|
|
going to teach you a lot of things about Rust, but before we can get
|
|
|
|
started, here's a couple of notes about how Rustlings operates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. The central concept behind Rustlings is that you solve exercises. These
|
|
|
|
exercises usually have some sort of syntax error in them, which will cause
|
|
|
|
them to fail compilation or testing. Sometimes there's a logic error instead
|
|
|
|
of a syntax error. No matter what error, it's your job to find it and fix it!
|
|
|
|
You'll know when you fixed it because then, the exercise will compile and
|
|
|
|
Rustlings will be able to move on to the next exercise.
|
|
|
|
2. If you run Rustlings in watch mode (which we recommend), it'll automatically
|
|
|
|
start with the first exercise. Don't get confused by an error message popping
|
|
|
|
up as soon as you run Rustlings! This is part of the exercise that you're
|
|
|
|
supposed to solve, so open the exercise file in an editor and start your
|
|
|
|
detective work!
|
|
|
|
3. If you're stuck on an exercise, there is a helpful hint you can view by typing
|
|
|
|
'hint' (in watch mode), or running `rustlings hint exercise_name`.
|
|
|
|
4. If an exercise doesn't make sense to you, feel free to open an issue on GitHub!
|
|
|
|
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rustlings/issues/new). We look at every issue,
|
|
|
|
and sometimes, other learners do too so you can help each other out!
|
2023-03-31 05:20:30 -04:00
|
|
|
5. If you want to use `rust-analyzer` with exercises, which provides features like
|
|
|
|
autocompletion, run the command `rustlings lsp`.
|
2021-04-27 17:09:44 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Got all that? Great! To get started, run `rustlings watch` in order to get the first
|
|
|
|
exercise. Make sure to have your editor open!"#;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-11-21 19:45:19 -05:00
|
|
|
const FENISH_LINE: &str = "+----------------------------------------------------+
|
2021-04-27 17:09:44 -04:00
|
|
|
| You made it to the Fe-nish line! |
|
|
|
|
+-------------------------- ------------------------+
|
2023-11-21 19:40:01 -05:00
|
|
|
\\/\x1b[31m
|
2021-04-27 17:09:44 -04:00
|
|
|
▒▒ ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ ▒▒
|
|
|
|
▒▒▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒▒▒
|
|
|
|
▒▒▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒▒▒
|
|
|
|
░░▒▒▒▒░░▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒░░▒▒▒▒
|
|
|
|
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓ ▓▓██ ▓▓ ▓▓██ ▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
|
|
|
|
▒▒▒▒ ▒▒ ████ ▒▒ ████ ▒▒░░ ▒▒▒▒
|
|
|
|
▒▒ ▒▒▒▒▒▒ ▒▒▒▒▒▒ ▒▒▒▒▒▒ ▒▒
|
|
|
|
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▒▒▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
|
|
|
|
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
|
|
|
|
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒██▒▒▒▒▒▒██▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
|
|
|
|
▒▒ ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒██████▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ ▒▒
|
|
|
|
▒▒ ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ ▒▒
|
|
|
|
▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒
|
|
|
|
▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒
|
2023-11-21 19:40:01 -05:00
|
|
|
▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒ ▒▒\x1b[0m
|
2021-04-27 17:09:44 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We hope you enjoyed learning about the various aspects of Rust!
|
|
|
|
If you noticed any issues, please don't hesitate to report them to our repo.
|
|
|
|
You can also contribute your own exercises to help the greater community!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before reporting an issue or contributing, please read our guidelines:
|
2023-08-26 17:07:20 -04:00
|
|
|
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustlings/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md";
|
2021-04-27 17:09:44 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2023-08-26 17:07:20 -04:00
|
|
|
const WELCOME: &str = r" welcome to...
|
2021-04-27 17:09:44 -04:00
|
|
|
_ _ _
|
|
|
|
_ __ _ _ ___| |_| (_)_ __ __ _ ___
|
|
|
|
| '__| | | / __| __| | | '_ \ / _` / __|
|
|
|
|
| | | |_| \__ \ |_| | | | | | (_| \__ \
|
|
|
|
|_| \__,_|___/\__|_|_|_| |_|\__, |___/
|
2023-08-26 17:07:20 -04:00
|
|
|
|___/";
|