12 commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Robert Fry	7eef5d15ee	docs: cleanup the explanation paragraphs at the start of each exercise.	2023-05-29 18:41:51 +01:00
PiqqiDesigns	c4627e7112	chore: clarified cow owned_no_mutation comments	2023-04-27 15:49:40 -07:00
Ali Afsharzadeh	382e16eb7e	feat(docs): add markdown linter for exercises README.md files	2023-03-30 19:53:22 +03:30
Cyril MARPAUD	045d86aa42	refactor(arc1): improve readability by avoiding implicit dereference	2023-02-18 21:38:43 +01:00
Daan Wynen	bbdc5c6039	refactor(cow1): replace main with tests ... Following the discussion in #1195 this is the best I could come up with. The issue for me (and apparently a few other learners) was that the code needed to complete the exercise was not _missing_, but was rather there but wrong. In the end, what made the difference between this exercise and others (for me) was that in this exercise I was supposed to learn what to *expect* of an output. So I think it makes sense here to let the learner modify the tests and not the code itself. Fixes #1195 Signed-off-by: Daan Wynen <black.puppydog@gmx.de> # Conflicts: # info.toml	2023-02-14 20:37:33 +01:00
Kevin Wan	4771a7b9e7	chore: fix prompt error ... Missed a blank line, which causes the prompt incorrect like below: ```rust You can keep working on this exercise, or jump into the next one by removing the `I AM NOT DONE` comment: 6 | // Make this code compile by using the proper Rc primitives to express that the sun has multiple owners. 7 | 8 | // I AM NOT DONE 9 | use std::rc::Rc; ```	2023-01-23 12:16:51 +08:00
seporterfield	66eaaf7b6e	fixed formatting	2023-01-01 02:17:53 +01:00
seporterfield	3fad2a9c83	gave smart_pointers its own README.md	2023-01-01 02:17:23 +01:00
seporterfield	a8fd315e09	moved rc to smart_pointers	2023-01-01 01:52:47 +01:00
seporterfield	e8c4aab643	moved cow to smart_pointers	2023-01-01 01:52:05 +01:00
seporterfield	c3bab88fda	moved box to smart_pointers	2023-01-01 01:51:27 +01:00
seporterfield	05592acf40	move arc to smart_pointers	2023-01-01 01:44:47 +01:00